Why do all stylists want to give me high hair?

I’m not sure if it’s because of my age or what, but virtually every time I go to get a haircut these days the stylist thinks I want to walk out looking like vintage Porter Wagoner and Conway Twitty, or current John Mellencamp.

Brain Farce is an alleged humor column written by Scott Adamson, who does not like wearing his hair high. Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

Porter and Conway, of course, once rocked that slick, high hair that was combed straight back. If they had ever brushed it forward, it would’ve reached their navels.

About the only other people you see with this particular ‘do are TV evangelists, funeral home directors and the brothers of killers on “Snapped.”

Mellencamp used to have basic “rocker” hair – long and mussed. It looked good on him.

As he got older, though, he channeled his inner Porter/Conway, adding quarts of Valvoline and seeing just how high on his head his hair would go.

These days the dude looks like a cross between Charles Starkweather and Brainiac thanks to his huge noggin and high hair.

This is not how I want to look.

This is not how I’ve ever wanted to look.

Of course, we’ve all evolved in terms of hairstyles.

As a kid, growing up in the sixties and cursed with poor eyesight, I had short, slick brown hair that accentuated my black horn rimmed glasses. I looked like Clark Kent if, in fact, Clark Kent had never left Krypton and instead was a member of the planet’s debate team.

By the 70s, in an effort to be more appealing to the opposite sex, I wore contact lenses and sported the “butt cut,” which was longer hair parted down the middle.

It would’ve been a decent look except my hard contacts were extremely uncomfortable and made my eyes water, so I always walked around looking as though I had just watched “Old Yeller.”

Hair stylists seem to think this is how I want my hair to look. They are wrong, for I do not want my hair to look this way.

In the 1980s I resumed wearing glasses and moved more toward the Elvis Costello look. While in a perfect world I would’ve preferred to wear my hair long, it started flipping on the ends, causing it to resemble Marlo Thomas’ cut in “That Girl.”

I love Marlo Thomas.

I didn’t love looking like Marlo Thomas in drag.

By the 1990s, I had settled on hair that was neither very long nor very short. And aside from a few brief flirtations with the “old hippie” look, I’ve basically stuck to a relatively simple hairstyle.

However, at no point have I ever slicked my hair back, which makes me wonder why people who cut my hair think that’s what I want.

Now – in the interest of full disclosure – I go to one of those haircut franchise places so I never know from one visit to the next who will be cutting my hair.

I just walk in and whoever has an available chair takes me. They’re all capable, obviously, but sometimes they don’t seem to listen.

“So what are we looking to do today?” Haircut person asks.

“Really, just a half-inch all the way around,” I say.

Simple, right?

Nope.

They snip and spritz and snip and spritz and then blow it dry while combing it backward.

Every single time.

“How does it look?” Haircut person asks.

“Actually, I don’t comb it back, so would you mind trimming some more off the top?” I ask.

“Sure,” haircut person says. “About how much?”

“Oh, 11 or 12 inches,” I say.

Once my hair reaches a reasonable length they ask if I want any “hair product” and I always decline, opting instead to fight my own style battle when I get home.

Look, I realize I’m not GQ material … I have no illusions that I’m going to leave the shop looking like a young George “Goober” Lindsey.

I also know that – technically – I’m a “senior,” and apparently society expects people over 50 to look a certain way.

Well, society can bite my ass.

I like my hair a little messy and I like to have the option of letting bangs rest gently against my forehead.

If I wanted to look like Porter Wagoner, Conway Twitty or John Mellencamp, I’d have become a singer-songwriter.

Instead I’m just a writer – one who will forever sing the praises of the first stylist who figures out how I want my hair to look.

Silverbacks keep grassroots soccer alive in Atlanta

It spends a lot of time in my upstairs closet, situated toward the back of the clothes rack where it remains mostly unworn.

Scott Adamson opines about The Beautiful Game periodically in Sidewinder Insider.

But every once in a while, I’ll break out the red jersey – the one with the Atlanta Silverbacks badge sandwiched between the Joma brand name on top and Premiere Global Services sponsor logo on the bottom.

It even has a sweet, old school USL logo on one of the sleeves.

And caps?

Oh, yeah, I got the caps – both a black one and a red one.

As a Birmingham native, Atlanta was always the closest big league town that had professional soccer.

So although I was a New York Cosmos fan back in the days of the original North America Soccer League, the Chiefs were something of a “home team” for me.

But while the Chiefs, like the NASL, are no more, the Silverbacks are survivors. And I’ve followed their odyssey from the beginning.

Officially, they’ve been around 20 years, becoming the Silverbacks in 1998. However, they actually started their soccer life as the Atlanta Ruckus in 1995.

I still break out the Silverbacks jersey and cap now and then.

Since then they’ve played in circuits such as the American Professional Soccer League (which morphed into the A-League), the United Soccer League First Division, the rebooted NASL and now the National Premier Soccer League.

I suppose one could make the case that they’re working their way down the ladder. But I’m not going to be that cynical, which is something of an upset because I’m cynical by nature.

True, in U.S. soccer’s unofficial pyramid, the NPSL represents the fourth division.

But if you like soccer from the ground up – and the NPSL is certainly that – it’s a great fit for a club that absolutely refuses to go six feet under.

And I love the way this club is going about its business.

Have you heard about the Atlanta Silverbacks FC Trust?

Go to asfctrust.org and read about it. Do that, and you’ll see how grassroots soccer is supposed to work.

The primary focus behind the trust is for fans to raise $100,000 to contribute to the club’s operating expenses. Once that threshold is met, it will own 25 percent of the team and have a seat on the board of directors.

This is the model of many successful soccer clubs in Europe and, in fact, partial fan ownership is required in Germany.

This is what community soccer is all about and what makes it accessible to everyone.

Certainly, Atlanta United FC is the “sexy” soccer team in the city right now. Shoot, with the number of fans it drew to Bobby Dodd Stadium and later Mercedes-Benz Stadium in its inaugural season in 2017, it’s the golden child of Major League Soccer.

And that’s terrific. The passion of Terminus Legion is very real and contagious – proof that the Deep South can be a futbol hotbed as well as a football hotbed.

But MLS has a single entity structure and Arthur Blank is the “investor-operator” of the franchise. The decision-making group is a small one.

If the Silverbacks get their way, though, fans will not only get a seat at the table, they’ll get to eat, too. It’ll be more than a club they root for because they’ll have skin in the game.

It’s kinda funny … for as long as the team has been around, I only got to cover it as a reporter once.

On March 28, 2015, the Silverbacks came to Riggs Field to play Clemson in an exhibition. Managed by Gary Smith (currently coach and TD of Nashville SC of the United Soccer League), they won on a goal by Matt Horth, who now serves as coach of Gordon College.

I spent a long time bending Smith’s ear after the match, and at the time it seemed that Atlanta and the modern iteration of the NASL might be in for a long association.

Of course that wasn’t the case.

Earlier in the week, the NASL announced it had canceled the 2018 season and you have to believe that decision was tantamount to folding for good.

But while that league won’t be going forward, the Silverbacks will, with their home opener at Silverbacks Park slated for May 26 against Asheville.

For those of us who want to see real change in American soccer, this is where it starts.

The Silverbacks are an old team that will feature young talent, and you don’t have to take out a loan to take your family to see a match.

I’m going to make a point to go to Silverbacks Park this season. The home team hosts Greenville FC on June 16, and since I’m based in Greenville, that might be a good excuse to take a road trip.

And the trust?

Maybe I’ll contribute to that as well. While it’s fun to talk about turning the United States into a soccer nation, it also requires some effort.

I need to put my money where my mouth is.

The Silverbacks have scratched and clawed their way through history, and I think their persistence should be rewarded.

It’s great to see them survive.

But it’ll be even greater to see them thrive.

Will less mean more in Major League Baseball this season?

We’re just over a month away from the start of the 2018 Major League Baseball regular season. And if all goes as planned, fans will be spending less time at the ballpark (and if front of the television) watching it.

Out of Left Field is written by Scott Adamson. It appears weekly and sometimes more frequently if he gets up in the middle of the night and can’t go back to sleep. Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

That’ll actually be a good thing.

Each February the lords of baseball consider rules changes, and make a tweak here and there when needed. This year the primary objective of Commissioner Rob Manfred and the gang is to speed up the game.

Let’s hope they have better luck this season than last.

Manfred was determined to shave off running time in 2017, too, but even making intentional walks automatic and shortening the window for managers to challenge calls didn’t help.

Just over 10 years ago an average MLB baseball game took about two hours and 45 minutes to play, which is fine.

In 2017, it took three hours and eight minutes.

That’s not fine.

That’s ridiculous.

As I’ve said before, if I’m going to sit through something that lasts more than three hours, Francis Ford Coppola better be directing it. And now that I’m out of the daily newspaper grind, I can actually watch – and enjoy – big league ball.

(That’s a side effect of being a sportswriter who also has office hours. Unless you cover an MLB team, you don’t actually see a lot of MLB games).

As for the rule alterations, I don’t think any of us wants to see “less” baseball; several years ago the Wall Street Journal did a study that determined the amount of action in an MLB game totals around 18 minutes.

But while we fans are fine with the slow-moving pace of the contest itself, the real time of a nine inning affair could use some streamlining.

Instant replay, endless mound visits and – thanks to TV – long commercial breaks, have turned watching baseball into quite a time investment.

So, if you have some time to kill and want to read them as written (courtesy of MLB.com), here are the changes for 2018:

  1. I) Mound Visits 
    Number
    A. 2018 Championship Season. Mound visits without a pitching change shall be limited to six (6) per team, per nine innings. For any extra-innings played, each Club shall be entitled to one additional non-pitching change mound visit per inning.  
    B. OBR 5.10(l). Official Baseball Rule 5.10(l), which governs mound visits by a manager or coach, remains in effect (i.e., a pitcher must be removed on the second visit by a manager/coach in an inning). 
  2. Definition of Mound Visit.A manager or coach trip to the mound to meet with the pitcher shall constitute a visit. A player leaving his position to confer with the pitcher, including a pitcher leaving the mound to confer with another player, shall also constitute a mound visit, regardless of where the visit occurs or the length of the visit, except that the following shall not constitute mound visits:
    A. Discussions between pitchers and position player(s) that (i) occur between batters in the normal course of play and do not require either the position player(s) or the pitcher to relocate;
    B. Visits by position players to the mound to clean spikes in rainy conditions;
    C. Visits to the mound due to an injury or potential injury of the pitcher; and
    D. Visits to the mound after the announcement of an offensive substitution.
  3. 3. Cross-Up in Signs.In the event a team has exhausted its allotment of mound visits in a game (or extra inning) and the home plate umpire determines that the catcher and pitcher did not have a shared understanding of the location or type of pitch that had been signaled by the catcher (otherwise referred to as a “cross-up”), the home plate umpire may, upon request of the catcher, allow the catcher to make a brief mound visit. Any mound visit resulting from a cross-up prior to a team exhausting its allotted number of visits shall count against a team’s total number of allotted mound visits.
  4. II) Inning Breaks and Pitching Changes
    Time of Break. The timer will count down from 2:05 for breaks in locally televised championship season games, from 2:25 for breaks in nationally televised championship season games, and from 2:55 for tie-breaker and postseason games as follows: 

Time Remaining | Required Action
25 seconds: 
Umpire signals pitcher to complete last warmup pitch.

20 seconds: Batter’s announced and must leave on-deck circle, batter walk-up music shall begin, and pitcher shall complete last warmup pitch.
0 seconds: Pitcher must begin motion to deliver first pitch.

  1. The pitcher may take as many warm-up pitches as he desires, but regardless of how many warm-up pitches he has thrown, he must deliver his final warm-up pitch at least 20 seconds prior to the end of an inning break or pitching change. OBR 5:07 will be revised to reflect that pitcher is not guaranteed eight warm-up pitches. 
    B. The umpire shall signal for the last warm-up pitch at 25 seconds, unless a special circumstance (as described below) applies. 
    C. The batter must leave the on-deck circle and proceed directly to the batter’s box when the pitcher throws his final warm-up pitch.  
    D.The pitcher must begin his motion for the first pitch as soon as the batter steps into the box and is alert to the pitcher; provided, however, the pitcher cannot begin his motion for the first pitch more than five seconds prior to the end of an inning break or pitching change so that television is ensured to be back from commercial break. 
  2. Special Circumstances. A Player will be excused from following the time limits set forth above if the umpire determines that any of the following special circumstances are present:  
    A. There is a delay in normal warm-up activities during the inning break due to no fault of the Players (e.g., injury or other medical emergency, equipment issues, playing field or grounds crew issues);
    B. The umpire believes the pitcher is at a legitimate risk of injury if he does not receive additional time to throw warm-up pitches; 
    C.The umpire believes the batter is at a legitimate risk of injury if he does not receive additional time to enter the batter’s box; 
    D.Any other special circumstances which, in the umpire’s judgment, warrant allowing the pitcher to throw after the deadline. 
  3. Start of Timer for Inning Breaks
    A.Last Out of Inning. The timer shall start on the last out of an inning for an inning break.   
    B.Close Plays/Replay Review. The Field Timing Coordinator shall delay the start of the timer if the final out of the inning is a close play that may be reviewed by instant replay. If the final out of the inning is determined in instant replay, the timer shall start as soon as the out is signaled by the umpire.  
    C. Pitcher or Catcher On Base/On Deck. If a pitcher ends an inning on base, on deck, or at bat, the timer shall reset when the pitcher leaves the dugout for the mound. If a catcher ends the inning on base, on deck, or at bat, the timer will reset when the catcher enters the dugout (and another catcher must begin warming up the pitcher). 
     
    4. Start of Timer for Pitching Changes
    A. Pitcher Crosses Warning Track. The pitching change timer shall begin as soon as the relief pitcher crosses the warning track (or foul line for on-field bullpens) to enter the game. In the case of a pitching change that occurs during an inning break, the timer shall reset if previously started as soon as the relief pitcher crosses the warning track (or foul line for on-field bullpens).  
    B. Relief Pitchers Must Promptly Leave Bullpen. Relief pitchers shall leave the bullpen promptly following an appropriate signal by their manager or coach. During the playing of God Bless America, or any other extended inning event previously approved by the Office of the Commissioner, the timer will begin at the conclusion of the song or event. 
     
    5. Enforcement. Umpires shall direct players and enforce the inning break and pitching change time limits on the field. Players who consistently or flagrantly violate the time limits will be subject to progressive discipline for just cause by the Office of the Commissioner pursuant to Article XI(C) of the Basic Agreement. III. Batter’s Box Rule
    The batter’s box rule that was in effect during the 2017 season will remain in effect during the 2018 season.
  4. Video Replay Review
    The following adjustments will be made to the video replay technology:
    A.Install capability for all Club video review rooms to receive direct slow motion camera angles for the 2018 championship season; 
    B. Install new phone lines connecting the video review rooms and the dugout, and monitor the communications over those lines to prevent their use for sign-stealing.

Manfred had hoped to add a 20-second pitch clock as well as a between-batter clock for this season, but the MLB Players Association pushed back on those ideas.

The between-inning breaks might help some, although I can’t see it saving more than two or three minutes, tops.

The best chance to keep the game moving is faster instant replay reviews, although I could do without them altogether.

Nobody wants the guys in blue to determine a game and certainly bad calls suck (especially if they go against your team), but I can live with human error.

It has a certain charm.

The game is, after all, played by humans and those humans make errors all the time (just ask the Oakland Athletics, who committed a league-high 121 errors in 2017).

But unless you play it or coach it, sports is entertainment, and with so many entertainment options, you need to make your sport worth watching.

Length of games has damn near killed my enjoyment of college football, and I don’t want to reach the point where I start getting bored with a baseball game in the seventh inning.

That’s a right exclusive to L.A. Dodgers fans.

But we won’t know how things play out until they play ball, so here’s hoping Major League Baseball can master the under three hours thing in 2018.

I want to become a serious fan again.

It’s up to baseball to make it worth my time.