Category: History and More

(This column was originally published on Dec. 13, 2017).

Back when I worked for a living, I used to talk about the Canadian Football League so much that it became a bit of a joke among my fellow sports writers.

Since the colleges in my primary orbit were Clemson, South Carolina and Georgia, I could always be counted on to stay on top of which Tigers, Gamecocks and Bulldogs were in the CFL.

And as a UAB graduate, I keep a close on any Blazers who might find their way onto rosters as “internationals.”

Thing is, the CFL is not a novelty for me. I legitimately love it.

You might remember the league tried its “American experiment” a couple of decades ago in which franchises were placed in the United States. Personally, I thought the plan was terrific and had high hopes it would last.

Of course, it didn’t.

The CFL is not just a league of unique rules, it’s also very Canadian culturally, and the feng shui of tackle football dictates that the CFL have teams in Canadian cities only.

I get that, and respect it.

But since I now have a lot of free time on my hands, I’ve used an inordinate amount of it thinking about professional sports leagues that I would like to form.

One is the Global Football League, which I’ll address in a future column.

But the one nearest and dearest to my heart is the one I’ll write about today – the American League of Canadian Football.

Yep, the ALCF would bring the Canadian pro game to the Lower 48, giving Americans their own version of the CFL.

That means the ALCF would adopt most of the rules used by the CFL, such as:

• A playing field 110 yards long and 65 yards wide.
• Goal posts situated on the goal line.
• Three downs to make 10 yards and a first down.
• Twelve players to a side (extra slotback on offense, extra secondary player on defense).
• All backs allowed in motion toward the line of scrimmage.
• No fair catches on punt returns.
• Fumbled balls that go out of bounds belong to the last team to touch the ball.
• Kicking teams awarded a single point for missed field goals or punts that are downed in the end zone by the receiving team.
• Players who line up behind the kicker on a punt or field goal try may recover an “onside” kick.

Now remember I said the ALCF would adopt most rules of the CFL. One change would be the depth of end zones, which span 20 yards in the CFL. This was a problem that plagued the American experiment since many stadiums were not built to accommodate such lengthy playing fields.

So, while 20-yard deep end zones are desirable, teams will have to improvise and just make them as deep as possible (just think about the varied sizes of outfields in baseball and it makes better sense).

OK, now that we’ve got the rules set, we have to select cities.

This is the tough part.

When most leagues are formed, the first order of business is to get teams in major media markets for the purposes of advertising and TV revenue. Problem is, it’ll be impossible for the ALCF to compete with cities that field NFL teams.

So we won’t.

Instead, the 10-team ALCF will place its flagship franchises in Birmingham, Memphis, Norfolk, Orlando, Portland, Rochester, Sacramento, San Antonio, Tulsa and Wichita.

I’ve even gone to the trouble of giving the teams nicknames for you: Birmingham Battalion, Memphis Blues, Norfolk Mariners, Orlando Coasters, Portland Brews, Rochester Boom, Sacramento Rivermen, San Antonio Sol, Tulsa Oilers and Wichita Flight.

Following the CFL model, each team would play two exhibition games before embarking on an 18-game regular season that begins in June of each year. And, like their Canadian counterparts, the average salary for an ALCF player would be roughly $80,000 per season.

Am I the only person who has dreamed of such a league?

Maybe not.

I’m a member of a great Facebook group, “CFL Fans In SEC Country,” which features hardcore, knowledgeable fans – some who even venture to the Grey Cup every year.

But are there enough of them to put down seed money for the ALCF and make me commissioner?

That’s another story.

If they can pull it off, though, we’ll all have a helluva party when the Battalion hosts the Blues in the 2020 season opener.

It doesn’t happen often, but occasionally bias and logic line up perfectly.

So on Tuesday when I received my Football Writers Association of America ballot for the 2017 Eddie Robinson Coach of the Year Award, I voted for UAB’s Bill Clark.

And it was an easy decision.

Yes, I’m a UAB grad.

Yes, every Saturday during this college football season the only game I had a rooting interest in was the one involving the Blazers.

Yes, a big green flag with a dragon on it waves in front of my house throughout the scholastic year – a sign of my support for my alma mater in all sports.

Go ahead and accuse me of being a UAB fan because I am one.

But here’s the thing … voting for Clark shows no bias at all. In fact, it’s the logical choice.

I don’t know if he’ll win the FWAA honor, but he should – and he’s going to get a lot of votes from a lot of people who never gave UAB football a passing thought before it became impossible to ignore.

This is a team that heads to the Bahamas Bowl with an 8-4 record, despite not playing for two full seasons. That’s almost unbelievable.

Why?

Well, when school president Ray Watts coldly and cruelly shut the program down after a 6-6 campaign in 2014 (Clark’s first year at the helm), UAB football was quickly gutted.

Many of the players who helped the Blazers recover from the nightmarish regimes of Neil Callaway and Garrick McGee scattered to other schools (you’re welcome, South Alabama), and there was certainly no reason for Clark to hang around.

He could’ve cut and run after the ax fell and been an immediate success almost anywhere else, probably as a highly paid Power 5 assistant. Who knows, he might have even landed at a place with a trustworthy president and a board of trustees that wanted to help instead of hurt.

But a lot of hell-raising, cash-raising fans and big money Birmingham business leaders helped prompt Clark – a man of faith ­– to take a leap of faith and stay.

And when, against all odds, Blazer football was reinstated, Clark was ready to get to work.

And soon he was standing in front of a handful of holdovers and hopefuls, young men who were already special because they committed to being part of something special.

But let’s be realistic. Taking two years off in the Football Bowl Subdivision is not a recipe for success. Just ask SMU how long it takes to recover from the death penalty.

So 2017 was much more than a rebuilding project, it was a hard reboot. And talking as a fan, if UAB had finished 1-11 or 2-10, I wouldn’t have been at all discouraged.

I said the before the season started I’d be thrilled with a 4-8 record because that was the worksheet that seemed most realistic.

Clark thought otherwise.

He knew otherwise.

He convinced the kids that they were far better than even their biggest supporters believed, and before long they were proving everybody wrong.

These guys had absolutely no business whatsoever registering eight victories, yet they did. And while they didn’t win a division title or play for any kind of championship, no team in the country rose from nothing to something like the Blazers did.

And no coach in the country did a better job than Clark.

Sure, there are plenty of solid coach of the year nominees.

Lane Kiffin showed he was more than just an epic Tweeter when he turned a 3-9 Florida Atlantic team into the 10-3 Conference USA champions.

Army’s Jeff Monken has led the Black Knights to eight wins heading into this weekend’s showdown with Navy.

Scott Frost – right before he was named the new head coach at Nebraska – guided Central Florida to a 12-0 mark and will coach the Knights against Auburn in the Peach Bowl. A win there and UCF will finish as the only team in the FBS with a perfect record.

Lincoln Riley has Oklahoma in the College Football Playoff in his first season; Kirby Smart has Georgia in the CFP in his second; Fresno State’s Jeff Tedford transformed his Bulldogs from a toothless team to one with both bark and bite; and reigning national championship boss Dabo Swinney continues to build a dynasty at Clemson.

All of these coaches have done remarkable jobs.

Only one, however,  brought a program back to life.

So if you want to accuse me of voting for Clark as my choice for coach of the year because I’m biased, I’ll offer no defense.

But if you don’t think he’s the logical choice, maybe you’re dealing with some biases of your own.

By the time Saturday night had slipped into Sunday morning, the politicking on Twitter was in full force.

Fans of one-loss Alabama (11-1) were convinced the Crimson Tide was worthy of a spot in the College Football Playoff.

Supporters of two-loss Ohio State (11-2) – the freshly crowned Big Ten champions – were equally sure their Buckeyes deserved to join No. 1 Clemson (12-1) , No. 2 Oklahoma (12-1) and No. 3 Georgia (12-1) in college football’s most exclusive club.

So back and forth they went, bashing “experts” who disagreed with them while praising third parties who shared their party line.

Of course ultimately it came down to the CFP Selection Committee, whose members knew they would be highly unpopular in either Tuscaloosa or Columbus, depending on their decision.

Turns out it was Columbus that was the Whine Capital of the college football world today when Nick Saban’s charges grabbed the last spot and left Urban Meyer’s team out of the Final Four.

And while college football has changed dramatically since it first came to be nearly 150 years ago, complaining fans remain the one constant.

They’ll moan about their team being disrespected, groan about them being overlooked, and wail about the kids being unappreciated. Shoot, sometimes they even have a point.

And woe were the denizens of “The Discovery City” once they discovered their team wasn’t considered pretty enough to go to the dance.

“The committee views Alabama as a non-champion that is unequivocally one of the four best teams in the country, and that’s why they are in,” CFP committee chairman Kirby Hocutt said on a teleconference earlier today. “Here is why the committee ranked Alabama at No. 4.  Alabama has one loss, and it was on the road to now No. 7 Auburn. Ohio State has two losses, one by 15 points at home to Oklahoma, and the other more damaging by 31 points at unranked Iowa.
“Alabama is superior in just about every statistical category that we think are important. For example, they are No. 1 or No. 2 in every key defensive category.”

The Buckeyes had a Big Ten title going for it (a 27-21 victory over previously unbeaten Wisconsin last night), but as Hocutt said, both of their defeats were by substantial margins and one was simply horrible.

Plus, a two-loss team has yet to crack the CFP.

And as tempted as Ohio State faithful might’ve been to demand entry because their team won its league title, history was not on their side. Last year’s Buckeyes were playoff-bound while Penn State hoisted the Big Ten trophy – yet was assigned to the “New Year’s Six” Rose Bowl.

(11-2 Southern Cal won the Pac-12 title on Friday, by the way, but not a lot of fuss was made about the Trojans’ playoff snub. USC and Ohio State will meet in the Cotton Bowl on Dec. 29).

“You have to understand, they’re not kind of disappointed – they’re probably devastated,” Meyer said of his players. “But that’s one thing families do. How do you handle devastation? Get around those you love and let’s go back to work.”

Alabama hardly ended its season on a high note, which gave Ohio State hope it could play its way into the CFP.

UA had to rally late to beat a middlin’ Mississippi State team on Nov. 11; logged an easy win over Mercer a week later in a game that, frankly, should have never been scheduled; and then fell to Auburn 26-14 in the Iron Bowl – a contest that saw the Tide get outplayed and Saban, outcoached.

“Even though we didn’t finish in the last game like we’d like, we feel like the committee did a great job of picking the four best teams,” Saban said this afternoon. “We certainly feel like we’re one of the four best teams.”

Of course he does. But remember what I’ve been saying from Day One – this is more an invitational than a traditional playoff. And unless some major lawyering takes place, the Football Bowl Subdivision is contractually obligated to a four-team format for another decade.

And that’s too bad.

I was pimping a 16-team playoff long before it was a twinkle in the NCAA’s eye – back when the FBS was still Division 1-A. That model is based on the myth that all “major” college football programs are part of the same classification.

They aren’t. In name maybe, but not in practice.

The Power 5 conferences run the show and the Group of 5 schools are the second division of the FBS. That’s why 12-0 Central Florida, the only unbeaten team among its 130 members, never had any chance whatsoever of making the playoff.

And as long as the CFP is a Power 5 product, teams from leagues like the American Athletic and Conference USA never will.

So let’s just go ahead and admit that – in the eyes of college football’s overlords – there are only 65 major college teams (that includes all Power 5 conference members plus Notre Dame).

But even if you decrease the sample size to that number, the current CFP is still insufficient.

If there are five power conferences, shouldn’t playoff spots be available to the champions of those conferences?

And with the SEC taking up two places this year, more hell will be raised and the heat will be hotter as the CFP is cussed and discussed heading into next season.

Based on the committee’s final rankings, an 8-team playoff in 2017 would feature Clemson, Georgia, Oklahoma, Ohio State and Southern Cal as conference champ qualifiers, while Alabama, Wisconsin and Auburn would make it in as wildcards.

That would’ve left Penn State, Miami and Washington – all 10-2 ­– on the outside looking in.

Their fans – like those of Ohio State today – would also be upset, but with all leagues represented in the tourney the “fairness factor” would be adequately addressed.

Fairness, however, doesn’t really come into play.

So on New Year’s Day, the Sugar Bowl will have Superfight III between Clemson and Alabama, and the Rose Bowl will match up Georgia and Oklahoma in their first-ever gridiron meeting.

If the Crimson Tide and the Bulldogs both lose, the committee will look bad for putting two SEC teams in the field.

But even if they both win, building its entire format around five conferences but having room for only four participants makes the CFP look even worse.

Just ask Ohio State fans.