Where the Cosmos go, I’ll follow

What’s in a name?

Well, if the name happens to be “New York Cosmos,” what’s in it for me is 23 years of fandom spread out over nearly half a century.

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Bluesky @scottadamson1960.bsky.social

There were the Cosmos of the original North American Soccer League (1970-85), the Cosmos of the “new” NASL (2013-17), the National Premier Soccer League Cosmos (2018-19) and coming in August, the NPSL Members Cup Cosmos.

“We’re very excited to launch the Members Cup,” Cosmos Senior Vice President Joe Barone said. “It’s an important step to developing a full season, independent league where the New York Cosmos can grow and thrive.”

Yeah, about that … where we go from there, nobody knows.

What I do know is that wherever they go I’ll go with them, because I’m committed.

Now before I go further let me say that, yes, I’m acutely aware that the Cosmos of 2019 and the Cosmos of 1970 have little more than a name and badge in common. A club that spent the last two years playing short season adult amateur soccer doesn’t have much of a hereditary link to the one that used to draw 70,000 fans to Giants Stadium.

If a new basketball league came along, put a team in Seattle and named them the SuperSonics (which they couldn’t because they’d get sued by the NBA, but ignore that for a second because I’m trying to make a point here), that team would have no real ties to the Sonics of 1967-2008.

But guess what?

I don’t care.

I’m a sports fan, and sports fans don’t have to be logical.

I worshipped the original team, and after the brand went dormant for nearly 20 years and was reborn in the “NASL of a Lesser Soccer God,” I didn’t quibble with details.

As far as I was concerned, the Cosmos were back.

At no point did I expect the new Cosmos to sign Messi and Ronaldo or rival the Yankees or Mets for the attention of sports fans in the Big Apple. Still, the Boys In Green were not only one of the reasons I fell in love with the Beautiful Game, but why I stayed in loved with it.

Plus, I kinda liked the rebooted NASL, thinking that perhaps one day it might give Major League Soccer some headaches.

Instead it’s now in legal purgatory, and I’m starting to believe there’s no way in hell it’ll ever come back.

That’s what led the Cosmos to the NPSL. And just days after playing Miami FC for the league title on Saturday they’ll join Chattanooga FC, Detroit City FC, Michigan Stars FC, Milwaukee Torrent, and Napa Valley 1839 FC in what was previously known as the Founders Cup – and much larger.

“We are expecting a high level of competition in the Members Cup, and we are so thankful for (owner) Rocco Commisso’s commitment to the club and this new exciting league,” New York Coach Carlos Mendes said.

When the “NPSL Pro” initiative was first announced there were 11 members and it was set up to be a new insurgent league that wouldn’t be bound to the whims of the United States Soccer Federation. The NPSL is governed by the United States Adult Soccer Association.

But along came the National Independent Soccer Association – reinvented as part of the USSF structure and set to start its inaugural season this fall – and several Founders Cup founders (Including Miami FC, Oakland Roots, California United Strikers FC) found it better suited their future plans, so they pulled out.

Which, if any, current Members Cup clubs decide to join NISA in 2020 remains to be seen.

I suppose the Cosmos could be one, but it seems unlikely since Commisso isn’t someone interested in doing the bidding of the USSF. In June he purchased Serie A side ACF Fiorentina, and in 2018 famously proposed a $500 million investment in USSF that would revive the NASL and introduce promotion/relegation.

U.S. soccer officials weren’t interested, and it’s hard to imagine Commisso jumping at the chance to hook up with NISA.

But if not NISA, what?

After the NPSL Members Cup is done, the league’s pro plans appear to be off the table for the forseeable future.

In a perfect world, I’d like to see the Cosmos, Chattanooga FC and Detroit FC move forward together. Of course in a perfect world, I’d like to see Asheville City SC and Greenville FC join them.

But lower division soccer – and I say this out of love – is kinda like a sports version of the Monty Python skit “100 Yards For People With No Sense of Direction.” With myriad leagues and clubs, finding a common path is a big ask.

That being said, whichever direction the Cosmos head, I’ll follow.

After all, they’re my club.

New football leagues are often old ideas

I love doing research, so one of the most rewarding things about writing my first book (the working title is Cheers Through The Years: My Hot (And Sometimes Cold) Bromance With Birmingham Pro Football) is digging into history.

Scott Adamson writes about alternative pro football leagues because it makes him happy, Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

As someone who is obsessed with the Magic City’s frequent brushes with the play-for-pay gridiron game, I pride myself on having a good bit of walking around knowledge when it comes to the World Football League, United States Football League, World League of American Football, etc.

But sometimes you forget a detail here and there, and that’s when it’s time to take a deep-dive into newspaper archives.

And while doing a second draft of Cheers Through The Years and cross-referencing the section devoted to the USFL’s Birmingham Stallions recently, I came across some pretty cool stuff.

And I was reminded that when it comes to alternative football leagues, there’s really nothing new under the sun.

I knew, for example, that the United States Football League (1983-85) was the brainchild of Louisiana sports executive Dave Dixon, who had the idea for it nearly two decades earlier.

What I didn’t realize, however, was that he not only planned the league back in the mid-1960s, but was on the verge of actually getting it up and running.

On April 11, 1965, the Dallas Times-Herald ran a story announcing the formation of the United States Football League, which would begin play in 1966 with franchises in Anaheim, Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, New Orleans and either San Francisco or Seattle.

But instead of going head to head with the National Football League and the American Football League, the USFL would – you guessed it – play in the spring.

The season would begin in January and end in May, with the championship game staged on Memorial Day.

Aside from the gimmick of offseason football, the league was to feature a central scouting system that would draft players and assign them to teams, and encourage “non-standardized professional offenses” by including the I-formation, double-wing and single-wing.

And the players would need to be in top physical shape; there would be no halftime intermission. The idea was to fit a contest into a two-hour window and make the USFL a made-for-TV football production.

Dixon was also courting both the NFL and AFL in hopes of landing an expansion team in New Orleans, so a cynic might wonder whether or not his formation of the USFL was more about leverage than creating a legitimate third major league.

“I do think pro football is just in its infancy,” Dixon told the Associated Press. “There are a number of other deserving cities – at least a dozen besides New Orleans – who want and can support pro football.”

But wait – as the obnoxious TV announcer might say – there’s more!

Remember the World League of American Football, which had North American-based teams in 1991 and 1992 before being reformed as NFL Europe?

It had roots in 1965, too.

Almost immediately after Dixon announced the formation of the USFL, Dallas Cowboys general manager Tex Schramm said the NFL was also considering its own January to May league.

The difference between the NFL’s circuit and the USFL was that it would be something of a farm system, which would feature some NFL players but mostly hopefuls working to earn a place on a big league roster.

Teams would be placed in cities that didn’t have NFL or AFL franchises.

“We have thought of going into this as an adjunct to our own league,” Schramm told the Los Angeles Times. “Television is very anxious to have us get involved in it.”

Obviously, the earliest iterations of Dixon’s and Schramm’s leagues never made it from the drawing board to the field. Yet the seeds were planted.

The USFL we know and love started 18 years after Dixon proposed it, and played three glorious spring seasons.

It featured some of the best football players in the game (eight USFL alumni are in the Pro Football Hall of Fame). In fact, four Hall of Famers began their careers in the modern USFL – Jim Kelly, Reggie White, Steve Young and Gary Zimmerman.

Aside from introducing concepts such as the coach’s challenges and two-point conversion, it also forced the NFL to dramatically increase player salaries.

As for an NFL spring farm system, Schramm finally got his World League up and running 26 years after he thought it up – with the NFL underwriting it. Ironically, the closer the league came to fruition the more Schramm wanted to make it less a feeder league and more of an “aggressive, broad world league.”

That difference in philosophy ended up getting him fired before the WLAF ever played a down.

So, what’s the moral of this story?

Well, as much as goobs like me love the idea of “new” football leagues, the ideas behind them aren’t really new at all.

Creating one built to last, though … now that would be a first.

 

Major League Rugby builds for the future

The Seattle Seawolves celebrate their second straight Major League Rugby championship. (David Frerker photo)

When the San Diego Legion scored in the waning seconds to defeat Rugby United New York, 24-22, back in June, I felt a real sense of disappointment.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

A win would’ve put New York in the Major League Rugby championship game, while a loss meant their season was over. I was hoping the Orange and Blue would pull it out, because they’ve become my favorite team in a sport I’m growing increasingly fond of.

Developing that kind of attachment is significant considering that a couple of years ago my knowledge (and interest) in rugby was mostly confined to the movie “Invictus.”

Yet a little over a month after Major League Rugby closed out Year Two (with the Seattle Seawolves claiming their second consecutive MLR crown), I’m already looking forward to its “new and improved” 2020 version.

I got curious about North America’s pro rugby league during its inaugural season in 2018, giving it what you might call a loose follow.

The organization featured the Austin Elite, Glendale Raptors, Houston SaberCats, New Orleans Gold, San Diego Legion, Seattle and the Utah Warriors.

This year, though, it added New York and the Toronto Arrows, and I became a legitimate fan. I watched as many matches as I could and kept track of player performances across the league.

New York became my team of choice because – although I’m a Birmingham, Alabama, native – the Big Apple is always my default sports city.

And as someone who has spent many a spring hoping upstart football leagues would take hold, now I’m more concerned with pro rugby sticking its landing.

And so far, it seems to be on the right track.

When Major League Rugby gets back in action next February, there will be 12 teams thanks to the addition of the New England Free Jacks, Old Glory DC and Rugby ATL. Expansion goes against the trend of upstart leagues that tend to sputter at launch and then crash and burn.

“It was our sophomore year and we grew a little bit, and that’s an atypical thing in the world of sports,” MLR commissioner Dean Howes told Martin Pegelly of The Guardian. “Your second year is usually kind of a tough year, and I think we grew and I think we’re poised to build.”

Unlike spring football circuits that will always live under the shadow of the NFL, MLR has the potential to cast its own shadow.

PRO Rugby was the first pro league to set up shop in America, but lasted only one season (2016).

MLR, on the other hand, has lured some of the United States’ best amateur rugby stars as well as respected international players.

“We want to build up our domestic teams, our players, and our national team,” Howes told The Guardian. “But at the same time we feel one of the important things is that we have some international players to try to teach our players.”

MLR also has a formal “strategic agreement” with USA Rugby, the governing body for the sport in America.

“The advent of professional rugby is such a substantial step in advancement of the game, so we’re happy to have built a robust partnership to best find mutual support in each other,” USA Rugby CEO Ross Young said.

So how far does MLR have to go before becoming a stable league?

By comparison the Premiership (the top-tier of rugby union competition in England), draws an average of 14,500 fans per match. In 2019 the MLR averaged 1,900 paying customers per contest, with the biggest crowd (6,000) showing up for Seattle’s win over San Diego in the championship match.

That might seem like a big gap, but attendance was trending upward as the season progressed, and the playoffs were a hit at the box office.

Some teams are still trying to find suitable stadiums, and I imagine if you could look five years into the future you’d see some MLR teams relocate or simply close up shop.

But, the fact that I can look five years into the future and see Major League Rugby a part of it is pretty exciting.

Hopefully, it’ll keep getting bigger and better.