Upon further review, it was a rough Sunday for NFL refs

Throughout most of my newspaper sports writing career, I tried to steer clear of criticizing officials. It’s a hard knock life for a ref (instead of kisses, they get kicked), and I didn’t want to add to their misery.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

But good lort … this might’ve been the worst season yet for NFL stripes, and they certainly put their worst foot forward in last Sunday’s NFC Championship Game.

The hot take in the Los Angeles Rams’ 26-23 overtime victory over the New Orleans Saints, of course, is to be outraged about the non-call that will live in infamy.

You know the story.

L.A. corner Nickell Robey-Coleman made a crushing, helmet-to-helmet hit on New Orleans receiver Tommylee Lewis long before Drew Brees’ pass got to him inside the 5-yard line.

The combo of pass interference and helmet-to-helmet contact made it the most obvious penalty since the first yellow flag was stitched. Hell, it could’ve been seen from the international space station.

Inexplicably, though, the NFL officiating crew didn’t see it – or at least didn’t call it.

Had they done so, the Saints would’ve had first-and-goal with under two minutes to go.

They would’ve eaten the clock, most likely kicking a chip shot field goal on the final snap. Or maybe a plunge up the middle would’ve turned a conservative call into a touchdown.

Either way, their chances of winning the game would’ve been in the upper 90 percentile.

Instead, they had to settle for three (the no-call set up fourth and 10 from the 13), and the Rams were left with enough time to march downfield and tie things up in regulation.

That set the stage for Greg Zuerlein’s game-winning 57-yard field goal, although Saints faithful will always believe they were jobbed and robbed and I’d feel the same way if I were them.

But …

If we’re going to blame the officials – and they deserve a lot of blame – let’s go all in. This crew was horrible all day long and made more than one potential game-changing blunder. One just happened to occur in the waning minutes of the game, magnifying it that much more.

For example, one no-call resulted in a New Orleans touchdown and another probably denied L.A. one of its own.

The Saints scored on a second-and-goal play in the third quarter to go up 20-10, even though the play clock clearly hit double zeroes before the snap.

Had the flag been thrown, New Orleans would’ve faced a second and goal from the seven.

They might’ve still scored a TD, but it would’ve been more difficult.

And in the fourth quarter – with his squad trailing 20-17 – Rams QB Jared Goff scrambled on a third down play and was pulled down by his facemask. If the official makes the call, L.A. has first and goal at the 1 but instead had to settle for a field goal.

A touchdown would’ve put the Rams ahead 24-20, and the Saints would’ve been forced to score a TD to regain the lead.

But none of those things happened, and now we’re left to debate all the might-have-beens.

And in the interest of equal time, the crew in the AFC Championship Game had their shaky moments in New England’s 37-31 O.T. conquest of Kansas City.

I’m not sure there’ll ever be consensus on Julian Edelman’s muffed punt return, although I tend to think overturning that ruling was the correct decision

My favorite penalty call, however, was the roughing-the-passer flag against K.C.’s Chris Jones.

People have applied Vicks VapoRub with more force than Jones used against Tom Brady.

So what’s the solution?

The quick answer is to at least make pass interference reviewable since it tends to the infraction that’s frequently the most “iffy.” For that to happen, the NFL competition committee would need to put it on the table and 24 of the 32 league owners have to approve it.

You can count Saints owner Gayle Benson as an “aye” vote there.

But if and when that happens, a game that is becoming increasingly lengthy will grow longer still.

When first introduced, I thought video replay reviews would be a great addition to the game.

I’m not sure I believe that anymore.

I’ll never understand how officials can pore over a replay like they’re examining the Zapruder film, yet still get the call wrong. But they do, and now games that used to run at a crisp two hours and 45 minutes are dragging on well past three hours.

Throw interference flag reviews into the mix – even something as obvious as Sunday’s no-call – and you’ll add more down time to the NFL “experience.”

Here’s an idea: look to Canadian Football League officials for guidance. After all, the leagues already have an exchange program where NFL refs work early season CFL games and CFL refs “intern” at NFL mini-camps and clinics.

CFL contests – on average – clock in at well under three hours, and the refs have a whole lot more to look at.

Not only are all backs and receivers (other than the quarterback) allowed in motion toward the line of scrimmage, there are 12 players to a side on a 65-yard wide, 110-yard long field and you can even attempt an onside punt, for heaven’s sake.

Oh yeah – coaches are allowed to challenge interference calls and when refs review plays, they don’t screw around.

Obviously CFL officials make mistakes, too, and I won’t deny I tend to view football things through Maple Leaf-colored glasses.

Still, that league’s video replay era seems to be marked by much less error.

Whatever the case, here’s hoping NFL officials will get their act together and be able to end the season on a high note in the Super Bowl.

After all, the best way for refs to be remembered is to not be remembered at all.

Will the FFL become more than an idea?

The Freedom Football League – the latest in a sudden surge of upstart pro gridiron circuits – has a bold vision.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

The question is, will anyone ever see it?

Late last year, 12-year National Football League veteran and Heisman Trophy winner Ricky Williams announced the formation of the FFL. He is one of 50 former NFL players who are stakeholders in the venture, which would turn corporate football on its head if successful.

The early takeaway is that the league is as much a social movement as it is a sports business.

According to the FFL website:

“What began as a moment where former NFL players began re-imagining and re-thinking the ownership structure of professional football has evolved into a movement. In a league owned by fans and players together, this movement profoundly and boldly replaces the exploitative power dynamic between owners and players and revolutionizes the relationship between fans and the teams they root for. Billionaire owners have for too long put their wealth and greed ahead of the health and safety of the men on the field. And more recently, the voices and free will of players as humans has been thwarted and stifled. Players who speak out against societal injustices that plague our nation are punished by a power structure threatened to admit the truth.”

The movers and shakers of the league vow to “fight institutionalized racism through unity” and explicitly state that “billionaires are not welcome.”

Standing up for what they believe and making it the guiding force of the league is all well and good. Ultimately, though, its success will be determined by how the game itself resonates with fans.

To that end, the FFL – in theory – will be about as fan-friendly a football league as one could hope for.

Instead of a sugar daddy owner, the franchises will be a joint venture between players and fan investors. And while there are 10 franchises currently on paper, San Diego is the first to be officially announced. In that team’s news release it states that the club’s “distributed ownership model” mandates that no person or group can invest more than $1 million, thus preventing a controlling position.

Basically, players and fans will be partners and decisions on the direction of a given franchise will be communal.

From the website:

“The FFL will be owned by a unique consortium that includes former NFL players, active players from each FFL team, the local franchise operators, and most uniquely, the fans.”

Joining the San Diego Warriors in a planned 2020 launch are the Birmingham Kings, Connecticut Underground, Florida Strong, Oakland Panthers, Ohio Players, Oklahoma City Power, Portland Progress, St. Louis Independence and Texas Revolution.

Again, San Diego is the only franchise that currently exists; the cities and nicknames were unveiled in concert with the league announcement, a true “cart before the horse” moment in the annals of sports.

It reminds me a bit of the late David Dixon’s grand ideas.

The United States Football League was Dixon’s brainchild, but when league owners went on a spending spree and began competing with the NFL for players, he became disillusioned and disassociated himself from it.

In 1987 he tried to form America’s Football League, Inc., which would feature fan ownership, but it never got off the ground.

A decade later he revived it in the form of the Fan Ownership Football League, where 70 percent of each team’s stock would be sold to the general public.

It never made it past the drawing board, either.

Yet here we are in 2019, with another group vowing to give fans more than a rooting interest.

But …

Will the salaries be “major league” or “minor league”? Players might want to distance themselves from billionaire owners, but I assume they’ll want and expect to be paid good money. If the FFL wants to take on the power structure of the NFL, it seems the best way to do that is to give fans a comparable product.

Are the rules similar to the NFL or will they be innovative, giving the league an on-field gimmick?

When will the season take place? The Alliance of American Football starts next month and the rebooted XFL takes the field in February, 2020, so the spring and summer is about to get crowded with pigskins.

And the biggest question of all, will the Freedom Football League ever even get off the ground?

Hopefully more info will be forthcoming soon. As I’ve said ad nauseam, I’ll always give a new pro football organization a chance – and the motivation behind the Freedom Football League is admirable.

But to be taken seriously, it has to get down to the serious business of identifying stadiums, players and coaches.

Until that happens, it’s still nothing more than a nice idea.

For more information on the league, go to www.freedomfootball.co

 

 

Watching all bowl games isn’t mandatory

We’ve now reached the portion of the holiday season where college football fans – seemingly a lot of them, anyway – start bitching and moaning about the large number of bowl games.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

“Who cares about the Shawshank Shiv Bowl?”

“How dare ESPN televise bowls I care nothing about!”

“Having a bowl in the Bahamas is un-American!”

I’ll bet the gatekeepers of all that is good and righteous about major college football were indignant last Saturday when five bowl games (plus the Football Championship Subdivision Celebration Bowl) littered the airwaves.

But you know what?

I hooked up to the Google Machine and have determined that there is absolutely no enforceable law on any book that requires you to watch a single bowl game.

Seriously, you can ignore all of them without fear that a SWAT team will bust down your door, tie you in a chair, and force you to experience the Frisco Bowl Clockwork Orange-style.

With all the real problems in the real world, bowls ain’t among ‘em.

But since we’re on the subject, I’ll let you in on a little secret; with the glut of college football on TV, I’m kinda tired of it by mid-December. That being the case, there are only five bowls I plan to watch, and I’m about to check one off the list.

Tonight, I’ll see UAB play Northern Illinois in the Boca Raton Bowl because I’m a fan of the Blazers.

That’s the only reason.

Had the game featured, say, Louisiana Tech against Northern Illinois, I would’ve ignored it, choosing instead to watch “Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath” on A&E. That’s a really fascinating series, and I always hold out hope that at some point Kevin James and Jerry Stiller will show up and we can have a mini “King of Queens” reunion.

I also plan to watch the Fiesta Bowl on Dec. 29, just to see if unbeaten Central Florida can stay perfect and defeat SEC foe LSU.

As a fan of a Group of 5 team, I like it when Cinderella* gets the chance to slipper-whip a Power 5 school.

* UCF is no longer a “Cinderella,” but since the school is in the shadow of Disney World, the description seems appropriate. Plus, I really wanted to use the phrase “slipper-whip.”

Finally, I’ll watch the Cotton Bowl (Notre Dame vs. Clemson), Orange Bowl (Oklahoma vs. Alabama) and College Football Playoff National Championship.

Even though it still makes me snort-laugh to think the NCAA considers culling four teams out of 130 a legitimate “playoff,” those are the three games that make up the major college football Final Four, and they interest me.

Now admittedly, things have changed dramatically since the days when bowls were considered “special.”

Back in the pre-parity era and before the glut of televised games, postseason matchups were designed as rewards for good seasons and often featured matchups between teams that rarely played.

In 1970, for example – about the time I really started paying attention to college football – there were only 10 bowl games and I watched as many as I could. All the biggies (Cotton, Sugar, Orange and Rose) were played on New Year’s Day, capping off a season where only 20 teams got to play beyond the regular season and a mythical* national champion was crowned.

* Sorry to use an asterisk again, but I also chuckle at the term “mythical national champion.” The teams declared the champion were quite real, even though the selection process might’ve been flawed.

Over the years, of course, more and more bowls have been added (40 this year) to the point that now it’s often hard to find teams with winning records to fill the slots.

With the number of 6-6 teams that earn berths, the only “reward” from some bowl games is finishing a game above .500

But again, so what?

ESPN Events outright owns 13 of the bowls currently on the schedule and 32 are televised on either ESPN or ESPN2. And the sports network couldn’t care less if there are 50,000 or 5,000 people in the stands because these games are designed to provide live programming.

And traditionally, they get good ratings.

While you or I might not be interested in the Potato Bowl, ESPN is most certainly interested in all the couch potatoes who are.

So sure, if you want to shake your fist because teams you deem unworthy of a bowl game are in bowl games, knock yourself out.

Or, you can do like me and simply ignore the games you aren’t interested in watching.

Because if 6-6 Vanderbilt playing 6-6 Baylor in the Texas Bowl is going to adversely affect your life, perhaps it’s time for some serious self-reflection.