Happy birthday, AFL

If you glance at the history of American professional football, you’ll find as many tombstones as you will milestones.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

While the National Football League has grown into the most lucrative sports league on the planet (it takes in roughly $13 billion per year), upstarts such as the World Football League and United States Football League drown in red ink.

But 60 years ago today, a competitor decided to challenge the status quo.

And although it now exists as part of the NFL, the American Football League rattled the establishment by establishing itself as gridiron equals.

On August 14, 1959, Dallas millionaire Lamar Hunt led a meeting in Chicago that created a second major pro football league in the United States, one that would begin play in the fall of 1960 as the AFL.

Hunt announced that Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Denver and New York would have franchises, and there was a possibility two more cities could join for the inaugural campaign.

“We have definite commitments,” Hunt told the United Press International news service. “A kitty (pool of money) is being set up to assure the financial success of the league.”

The other owners – including Barron Hilton, who bought the L.A. franchise, and Bud Adams, head of the Houston entry – dubbed themselves the “Foolish Club” because of their audacious plan to take on the established NFL.

“We’ll try to beat the National Football League on their draft,” Hunt said, adding that the AFL would also bid against the NFL and the Canadian Football League for the best available talent.

The NFL had 12 teams in 1959 and was still playing second fiddle to Major League Baseball among sports fans. But the senior circuit got a huge popularity boost due to the 1958 championship game, one that saw the Baltimore Colts defeat the New York Giants, 23-17, in the league’s first-ever sudden death overtime game.

Featuring 17 players who went on to be inducted in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, that contest turned the NFL into a television hit. It’s widely considered the single event that ultimately propelled the NFL to its spot atop the American sports food chain.

That being the case, trying to go head-to-head with it seemed like a losing proposition.

What’s interesting, though, is there was little opposition among NFL officials when the formation of the AFL was first announced.

Hunt discussed the idea with NFL commissioner Bert Bell, who “gave the league his blessing” and said the franchises of each league would respect each other’s player contracts.

Even Vince Lombardi – about to embark on his first year as coach and general manager of the Green Bay Packers – was in favor of the AFL.

“There is plenty of talent around to support two leagues,” Lombardi told UPI.

While the movers and shakers of the AFL had only a year to get it up and running, they pulled it off, although the lineup was a bit different from the one proposed at the Chicago meeting.

The 1960 season featured the Boston Patriots, Buffalo Bills, Dallas Texans, Denver Broncos, Houston Oilers, Los Angeles Chargers, Oakland Raiders and Titans of New York.

The cordial relationship between the NFL and AFL ended quickly after the older organization announced that it would expand to both Dallas and Minneapolis. It also moved into Miami when the AFL was targeting a team for South Florida.

But the new league managed to add Boston, Buffalo and Oakland to the lineup, and started with eight teams instead of six.

AFL Commissioner Joe Foss negotiated a package TV deal for the league that guaranteed each team $225,000 for broadcast rights, and 70 percent of the players drafted out of college were signed by the fledgling organization.

“Even competition is the most important thing for our success,” Foss told the Associated Press on September 7, 1960. “One-sided games would be the worst thing that could happen and it is hoped that our plan has made that unlikely. We do not expect to be up to the standards of the National Football League, but inside the league the competition should be good.”

The rest, as they say, is history.

The relationship between America’s two major leagues got more acrimonious over the years (the Texans couldn’t compete with the Cowboys in Dallas and moved to Kansas City, where they were rebranded the Chiefs), but the AFL was proving to be on par with the NFL on the field.

On June 8, 1966 – three months before the start of the AFL’s seventh season – the two leagues announced a merger in an effort to end the bidding war for top talent. They would play four more seasons as separate leagues before joining forces as a unified National Football League in 1970.

It made perfect business sense, of course, but I hated to see the AFL loses its identity.

It was the league that made me passionate about football, and I found it far more entertaining than the NFL. Its games were high-scoring, its players free-spirited – it was everything I wanted as fan.

The AFL was the last real threat to the NFL, and proved that members of the “Foolish Club” were anything but.

It’s a league worthy of a monument, not a tombstone.

College playoffs a hot topic in 1966

With college football season fast approaching, it’ll soon be time to cuss and discuss your team’s chances of making the College Football Playoff.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

First, though, I’d like to salute a trio of playoff visionaries – Bud Wilkinson, Duffy Daugherty and Walter Byers – who were way ahead of their time.

In fact, their vision dates all the way back to 1966.

While playoffs at college football’s highest level have existed only five years, the debate has gone on for as long as I’ve followed the game. But until doing some research, I didn’t realize there was a real push for it in the mid-1960s.

Wilkinson, the legendary Oklahoma coach who guided the Sooners from 1947-63 – wrote a syndicated column that appeared in newspapers across the country on Oct. 19, 1966.

Even though OU teams had claimed three “mythical” national championships under his guidance, he longed for a system where it was determined on the field.

“No single football playoff plan is being advocated now, but it would probably follow the pattern of the basketball championships,” Wilkinson wrote. “Some conference champions would qualify automatically for the playoffs. Other teams would be chosen by a selection committee.”

Wilkinson also quoted Byers – then the executive director of the NCAA ­– in his column.

“Organizing a national collegiate football championship, under NCAA supervision, would have to follow the principles which govern the conduct of other NCAA championships, and result in no appreciable dislocation of the current bowl games which are a colorful part of our American tradition” Byers said. “I believe both of these necessary prerequisites could be guaranteed.”

Wilkinson said the playoffs would “probably involve fewer than 16 teams,” and suggested the semifinals and title game be rotated among bowls.

In the mid-1960s the Rose, Orange, Sugar and Cotton were the traditional New Year’s Day bowl games, while secondary postseason contests for major colleges consisted of the Bluebonnet, Gator, Liberty, and Sun bowls.

A couple of weeks after Wilkinson’s piece – on Halloween – Michigan State coach Duffy Daugherty proposed an eight-team playoff that included the champions of the Big Ten, Big Eight, SEC, Southwest, Pacific Coast and Atlantic Coast conferences, plus two leading independents (there were 20 in 1966).

“The television revenue from an NCAA playoff would be tremendous,” Daugherty told the Associated Press. “I would cut in all 120 NCAA member schools on the television receipts and let each school do with the money what it wants.

“It’s the only way to determine a national champion.”

Texas coach Darrell Royal and Arkansas boss Frank Broyles were among the coaches who went on record in support of the idea.

What’s really interesting about Daugherty’s take is the timing of it. When he unveiled his plan, his Spartans were ranked No. 2 behind No. 1 Notre Dame, and three weeks removed from playing the Fighting Irish to a 10-10 tie in what was deemed the “Game of the Century.”

That was also the season Alabama finished undefeated but ranked third in the final poll, denying the Crimson Tide a third consecutive national crown.

In the pre-bowl Associated Press poll – which determined the unofficial national champ – Notre Dame was No. 1, followed by Michigan State, Alabama, Georgia, UCLA, Nebraska, Purdue and Georgia Tech.

Notre Dame Coach Ara Parseghian later defended the final ranking by pointing out that the Irish had played five Top 10 teams (finishing 4-0-1 against them) while the Tide’s only Top 10 foe was Nebraska, Alabama’s Sugar Bowl victim.

Had the “Daugherty Plan” been in effect, Notre Dame and Georgia Tech would’ve made the playoff as the top independents while Michigan State (Big Ten), Alabama (SEC), UCLA (Pacific Coast), and Nebraska (Big Eight) would’ve qualified for winning their conference titles.

Clemson won the ACC with a 6-4 record while 8-3 SMU was champion of the Southwest, so the Tigers and Mustangs would’ve snatched away berths from higher ranked Georgia and Purdue, thus completing the field.

Some coaches and university officials expressed their skepticism, but Byers remained bullish.

“We’re now playing postseason football from the first week in December through the first week of January,” he told the Associated Press. “I can’t see that a playoff would add greatly to extending the season if it could be worked into the bowl games.”

The NCAA initiated a feasibility study of an eight-team playoff in 1967 and it drug on for two years. Finally, NCAA President Harry Cross said the governing body had “discharged” the special committee studying the proposal.

“Which means the possibility of playoffs being presently developed is ended,” Cross told the Associated Press in 1969. “My guess would be there was some concern from the bowl game persons. I think any of us could expect there would be.

“I don’t know of any person or group that intends to recommend it again.”

After that postseason playoff plans ran hot and cold through the years, from “maybe” to “absolutely not,” until the CFP was implemented in 2014.

So in just a few weeks, 64 members of the Power Five conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac 12 and SEC) plus Notre Dame will begin a new football season they hope culminates in a playoff berth.

The 65 programs comprising the Group of Five conferences (American Athletic, Conference USA, Mid-American, Mountain West and Sun Belt) have no chance to make the playoffs under the current format, and must hope for a New Year’s Six bowl as a consolation prize. (Technically all 130 schools are eligible for the playoffs, but you might want to ask Central Florida how realistic it is).

Yet as lucrative as the CFP has become, the logical next step is to take a cue from ol’ Duffy and expand the field to eight teams (the current four-team contract runs through 2026).

Once that’s done, all Power Five conference champions will get in, plus three wildcards. And in the CFP executive committee’s benevolence, every now and again they might even let the highest ranked Group of Five team join the party.

I personally prefer an inclusive 16-team playoff (all 10 conference champions and six wildcards), but that’s a big ask and nobody asked me. The next best thing is doubling the current field, and that would be a major step forward.

And should it happen, that step can be traced back to 1966.

Major League Rugby builds for the future

The Seattle Seawolves celebrate their second straight Major League Rugby championship. (David Frerker photo)

When the San Diego Legion scored in the waning seconds to defeat Rugby United New York, 24-22, back in June, I felt a real sense of disappointment.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

A win would’ve put New York in the Major League Rugby championship game, while a loss meant their season was over. I was hoping the Orange and Blue would pull it out, because they’ve become my favorite team in a sport I’m growing increasingly fond of.

Developing that kind of attachment is significant considering that a couple of years ago my knowledge (and interest) in rugby was mostly confined to the movie “Invictus.”

Yet a little over a month after Major League Rugby closed out Year Two (with the Seattle Seawolves claiming their second consecutive MLR crown), I’m already looking forward to its “new and improved” 2020 version.

I got curious about North America’s pro rugby league during its inaugural season in 2018, giving it what you might call a loose follow.

The organization featured the Austin Elite, Glendale Raptors, Houston SaberCats, New Orleans Gold, San Diego Legion, Seattle and the Utah Warriors.

This year, though, it added New York and the Toronto Arrows, and I became a legitimate fan. I watched as many matches as I could and kept track of player performances across the league.

New York became my team of choice because – although I’m a Birmingham, Alabama, native – the Big Apple is always my default sports city.

And as someone who has spent many a spring hoping upstart football leagues would take hold, now I’m more concerned with pro rugby sticking its landing.

And so far, it seems to be on the right track.

When Major League Rugby gets back in action next February, there will be 12 teams thanks to the addition of the New England Free Jacks, Old Glory DC and Rugby ATL. Expansion goes against the trend of upstart leagues that tend to sputter at launch and then crash and burn.

“It was our sophomore year and we grew a little bit, and that’s an atypical thing in the world of sports,” MLR commissioner Dean Howes told Martin Pegelly of The Guardian. “Your second year is usually kind of a tough year, and I think we grew and I think we’re poised to build.”

Unlike spring football circuits that will always live under the shadow of the NFL, MLR has the potential to cast its own shadow.

PRO Rugby was the first pro league to set up shop in America, but lasted only one season (2016).

MLR, on the other hand, has lured some of the United States’ best amateur rugby stars as well as respected international players.

“We want to build up our domestic teams, our players, and our national team,” Howes told The Guardian. “But at the same time we feel one of the important things is that we have some international players to try to teach our players.”

MLR also has a formal “strategic agreement” with USA Rugby, the governing body for the sport in America.

“The advent of professional rugby is such a substantial step in advancement of the game, so we’re happy to have built a robust partnership to best find mutual support in each other,” USA Rugby CEO Ross Young said.

So how far does MLR have to go before becoming a stable league?

By comparison the Premiership (the top-tier of rugby union competition in England), draws an average of 14,500 fans per match. In 2019 the MLR averaged 1,900 paying customers per contest, with the biggest crowd (6,000) showing up for Seattle’s win over San Diego in the championship match.

That might seem like a big gap, but attendance was trending upward as the season progressed, and the playoffs were a hit at the box office.

Some teams are still trying to find suitable stadiums, and I imagine if you could look five years into the future you’d see some MLR teams relocate or simply close up shop.

But, the fact that I can look five years into the future and see Major League Rugby a part of it is pretty exciting.

Hopefully, it’ll keep getting bigger and better.