The ABA’s last hurrah

On October 22, 1975, I was bummed out by news that the World Football League had folded. Two days later, however, the American Basketball Association was starting its ninth season, and under normal circumstances that would’ve lifted my spirits.

I loved the ABA; it was my favorite professional roundball organization then and if I could conjure it into existence now, I would. But October 24, 1975, was the beginning of the end, and its demise was quite obvious before the nine teams ever tipped off.

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Bluesky @scottadamson1960.bsky.social

In September of that year, the New York Nets (my favorite club) and Denver Nuggets had already applied for admission to the National Basketball Association. Four days before the 1975-76 campaign got under way, the rest of the franchises (Kentucky Colonels, Virginia Squires, San Antonio Spurs, Indiana Pacers, San Diego Sails, Spirits of St. Louis and Utah Stars) followed suit.

Each team sent an identical telegram to NBA Commissioner Larry O’Brien. It read:

“The (name of franchise) hereby request application for membership in the National Basketball Association, commencing with the 1976-77 season. If the NBA has interest in considering an application, we would like the NBA to join with us in petitioning Judge Robert L. Carter for permission to process an application under such circumstances as he may deem appropriate and consistent with his prior orders.”

Carter was hearing an action brought by the NBA Players Association in which they requested the right to negotiate with any team in any league. In addition, he had ruled that if there was a merger, it had to be approved by himself and the NBAPA.

On October 24, O’Brien said he was rejecting the ABA applications “for the time being,” meaning he was open to it once the legal issues were resolved.

And it wasn’t like there was any groundswell of support to save the ABA – not even among league officials. Commissioner Dave DeBusschere said owners pushed for a merger during their October 9-10 meetings.

“Of course, we realize this cannot be accomplished by our act alone because of outstanding court orders preventing any accommodations without the cooperation and agreement of the basketball players and the approval of the courts,” DeBusschere said in statement released by the league. “It is anticipated that our action will stimulate the necessary discussion between all the parties that make up professional basketball, owners and players alike, with a view toward putting professional basketball on a sound common sense and businesslike basis, ensuring its survival in a healthy atmosphere, free of  disputes, lawsuits and controversy for the ultimate benefit of its owners, players and most of all, its fans.”

I followed the NBA and enjoyed it (the Los Angeles Lakers and Milwaukee Bucks garnered most of my interest), but to me the ABA was more exciting – and far more fun to watch. It wasn’t just the red, white and blue basketballs, it was the free flowing, high-flying style of play.

Instead of a merger, I wanted to see two distinct leagues that remained separate until they played a best-of-seven Basketball World Series.

And the since the ABA came into its ninth year with a 31-17 record against the NBA in exhibition games, it had a legitimate shot at proving it was just as good (and sometimes better) than the senior circuit’s contingent.

Still, I was seeing all this through the lens of a 14-year old who had no interest in the business side of sports. If I had, I would’ve realized the ABA was already Dead League Walking.

At the dawn of the 1975-76 season, the NBA had 18 teams and a national TV contract with CBS. The ABA, on the other hand, had shrunk from the original 11 cities it repped beginning in 1967-68.

A Baltimore franchise (relocated from Memphis) folded during the preseason, and there was no countrywide television coverage. CBS stopped carrying ABA contests after the 1972-73 schedule was complete, and the Hughes Television Network deal was one-and-done in 1973-74.

The good news (for me, anyway) is that the Nets went on to win the championship in Year Nine.

The bad news is that the league as a whole limped to the finish line. The Sails folded after just 11 games and the Stars went out of business with a 4-12 record.

The Squires called it quits at the end of the regular season, leaving the American Basketball Association with only six squads.

New York wrapped up the title on May 13, 1976, and on June 17, it was announced that the Nets, Nuggets, Spurs and Pacers would be absorbed into the NBA. The Colonels and Spirit went sneakers up.

That was bittersweet news for me.

Yes, I was glad the Nets survived, but my favorite league was dead. It was as though the scrappy kids who rode the bus every day were now being forced to join a snooty private school – and play by their rules.

But, living in the past is depressing, so I’ve forgiven the NBA for smothering the ABA.

The Nets (now in Brooklyn) remain my favorite team, I continue to have a special fondness for the “leftovers” (Nuggets, Spurs, and Pacers), and I appreciate the stability and quality of a league that’s 30-teams strong.

The merger was, indeed, in the best interests of pro basketball.

Not gonna lie though – I’ll always miss those red, white and blue basketballs.

Basketball’s million dollar challenge

Fifty years ago today, the Golden State Warriors completed a four-game sweep of the Washington Bullets to claim the NBA championship – their first since moving to Northern California (from Philadelphia).

The Warriors finished 48-34 in the regular season before beating the Seattle SuperSonics (four games to two), Chicago Bulls (four games to three) and Washington.

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Bluesky @scottadamson1960.bsky.social

But while the champagne was still dripping from their uniforms, another professional basketball team challenged the NBA kings to a world championship showdown.

The Kentucky Colonels, champions of the American Basketball Association, wanted a series to determine the sport’s true champion. The Louisville-based club logged a 58-36 mark in the ABA regular season before topping the New York Nets, 108-99, to win the Eastern Division tiebreaker game.

The Colonels then bulldozed the Memphis Sounds in the first round of the playoffs, Spirits of St. Louis in the Eastern Conference Finals and Indiana Pacers in the ABA Finals.

They won all three series four games to one.

On the day Golden State raised its trophy, ABA Commissioner Dave DeBusschere sent a telegram to Warriors president Franklin Mieuli, NBA commissioner Walter Kennedy and commissioner-elect Larry O’Brien.

“The television networks would like to put on a world championship series between the two leagues,” read the cable. “A three to five-game series would provide an additional $1 million in revenue for the teams, the leagues and the players. Baseball has its World Series and football has its Super Bowl between the leagues. Professional basketball should have some method to determine the true world champions. We stand ready to prove who has the best team in professional basketball.”

Colonels owners John Y. Brown and his wife, Ellie Brown, had no immediate comment, but Kentucky assistant manager David Vance was all for the NBA vs. ABA challenge.

“We could play the series if they would play it,” he told Associated Press. “There’s no way they can claim to be world champions without beating all of the known world.”

The ABA was hardly punching above its weight when it made the offer. It had completed its eighth season and was already playing – and beating – NBA in exhibition games and talking about a champion vs. champion battle.

In fact, it held a 31-17 edge over the senior circuit in preseason action and was 16-7 in exhibitions played in advance of the 1974-75 campaign.

The Colonels finished 3-2 in their interleague exhibition slate, including wins over the Bullets and Bulls. And as for Kentucky’s credentials, they were coached by Hubie Brown and featured Artis Gilmore, Dan Issel and Louie Dampier – all four future Hall of Famers.

There had been merger talks for several years, so a roundball world series made perfect sense.

Well, it made perfect sense for the ABA.

The NBA had nothing to gain by such a matchup, and a day after DeBusschere sent the telegram Kennedy shot down the idea.

“The NBA, as usual with these annual challenges, rejects the 1975 proposal – period,” he said.

Thus, we’ll never know if the Colonels could’ve topped the Warriors. And sadly, we never got to find out how that franchise would’ve fared in the NBA.

After struggling with attendance during their early years (there was talk of moving the franchise to Cincinnati), the Colonels starting doing big box office business in the 1970s.

Average crowds for the 1970-71 season were 7,375, followed by 8,811 (1971-72), 7,113 (1972-73), 8,201 (1973-74), 8,727 (1974-75) and 6,935 (1975-76). By any standard of measure, they were one of the ABA’s strongest franchises.

There was a merger ahead of the 1976-77 season (it was completed on June 17, 1976), but it didn’t include Kentucky. That seemed odd, considering how crazy for basketball the Bluegrass State is. The NBA accepted the Nets, Pacers, Denver Nuggets and San Antonio Spurs, but the Spirits and Colonels were left out.

The omission of Kentucky is worth a whole ‘nother story (and maybe I’ll get to that another time).  Officially, John Brown declined to pay the $4.5 million entry fee to the NBA, which was treating the arrival of former ABA teams as expansion. Ultimately, Brown agreed to fold the franchise in exchange for $3 million, and its players were placed in a dispersal draft.

Anyway, I like to think the Colonels would’ve beaten the Warriors in the million dollar matchup.

As a guy who grew to love the game because of the ABA, how could I think otherwise?

NBA, European-style

As someone who firmly believes there’s no such thing as too much basketball, I embrace the sport wherever and whenever it’s played.

Domestically, the NBA, WNBA, G League and men’s and women’s college basketball get most of my attention, but I also follow the EuroLeague (Alba Berlin is my favored club) and the Basketball Africa League (I cheer for the Rivers Hoopers out of Nigeria).

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Bluesky @scottadamson1960.bsky.social

So, when the NBA and FIBA held a joint news conference late last month about the plan for a new pro hoops league in Europe, it quickly got my attention.

“The European basketball community is proud of its seven-decade history of international club competitions and the elite talent it develops,” said FIBA Secretary General Andreas Zagklis. “Yet, given the sport’s popularity and the success of national team competitions, there is untapped potential in European club basketball.  A new league in Europe would combine the NBA’s business acumen with the international expertise of FIBA to attract new basketball fans and investors alike, maximize club benefits, and establish synergies for the benefit of all stakeholders.”

Added NBA commissioner Adam Silver, “The NBA and FIBA are uniquely positioned to build on the rich tradition of European basketball. We look forward to collaborating with FIBA to explore the creation of a new league for fans across the continent.”

Nothing is set in stone, of course, and plans sometimes never get beyond the drawing board. But the fact that Silver and Zagklis have gone public with their attentions means they’re quite serious.

According to an NBA news release, potential investors and teams were contacted more than a year ago to gauge the feasibility of the NBA Europe League (or whatever it might be called).

The new organization would be “ … integrated into the current European basketball landscape, with teams also participating in their respective national leagues. In addition to permanent teams, the league would offer clubs a merit-based pathway to qualification through the European basketball ecosystem.”

BasketNews reports that Real Madrid is the top target among EuroLeague franchises, while England wants to join the party with a new club based in Manchester.

I alluded to being a supporter of Alba Berlin, and it appears they’ll be locked in to EuroLeague. BasketNews hinted that the proposed league covets a Berlin club, but would likely introduce a fresh one.

“It’s preliminary, maybe 12 permanent spots and four that would be in a position to play on yearly basis, but that’s subject to change,” Silver said during the presser – without ever mentioning EuroLeague. “We have ongoing discussion with existing clubs, some of them are huge global brands and we recognize that there’s a tremendous depth of interest.”

EuroLeague’s 13 shareholders are meeting on Monday in Barcelona to discuss the league’s future and how an NBA-sponsored competitor might impact it. Currently it features 18 clubs with an eye on expanding to 20 as early as next season.

As you might expect, EuroLeague CEO Paulius Motiejūnas thinks Europe is best represented by his operation.

“We have a strong league. We have a great plan. We have a vision as to where we want to go and what we want to do,” Motiejūnas said to Spanish broadcaster Movistar+. “Of course, we don’t need another league. We don’t need a savior. We keep saying that we have the best league in Europe. I think we have the best fanbase on which the league is built. We have great franchises like Real Madrid. We have new names like Paris coming in as a new market. Clearly, we feel strong.” 

In a perfect world, I’d love to see EuroLeague and the new venture come to some sort of arrangement where they can peacefully coexist. As exciting as it is to see the NBA expand its footprint further, EuroLeague’s roots date back to 1957 and as Motiejūnas says, it’s already strong.

But a perfect world this most certainly is not. Chances are there will be some major upheaval in European hoops if Silver and Zagklis partner up. take on the old guard and filch some of its biggest names.

Thus, I find myself hoping EuroLeague can hold the line while, at the same time, feeling excited about more big-time professional roundball.

Stay tuned …