Devouring the details

I’ve enjoyed spending the morning learning more about XFL 3.0 now that the league is taking shape. Even though the names of the eight cities that will begin play next winter had already been leaked, it was still good to get the official word. With that done, I’m curious about things like nicknames and logos and all the stuff that has caused me to goob out over alternative football for decades.

So, will I be watching when the league kicks off on February 18, 2023?

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

It depends.

If UAB or Birmingham’s G League team don’t have basketball games that day, I might. If the Blazers or Squadron are playing, however, then I’ll probably settle for watching the highlights on SportsCenter.

See, I learned a hard new truth about myself during the recently completed United States Football League season; when it comes to alt-leagues, I’ve reached the point in my life where I’m more interested in hearing about the labor pains than actually seeing the baby.

I know … I’m as surprised by that plot twist as you are.

I love discussing the structure of the organization, stadium agreements, coaching hires, pay scale, draft pools, roster size, and cool rule innovations. Seeing a league go from an idea to a product is fascinating, and right now I’m having fun tracking all the USFL guys who are being signed by NFL teams (I was especially happy to see one of my favorites, QB Luis Perez, ink a pact with the Los Angeles Rams on Saturday). These are topics I never grow tired of.

Yet, while there was once a time when football was my top sports viewing choice any time of year, I realized this spring my most fervent interest starts with the first week of the Canadian Football League regular season and ends with the Super Bowl. The non-traditional leagues that occupy the other months have become entities I want to analyze more than watch. They often lose out to everything from hockey to rugby when I flip on my sports fan switch.

That’s a “me problem,” though, and not a knock against their quality at all. There are some truly outstanding players outside of the NFL and CFL, and it’s great they have multiple showcases to display their talent. I’m all for more athletes getting more opportunities.

It’s just that as I’ve gotten older, I don’t mind taking a break from the gridiron game.

Fortunately, these new ventures don’t need me. The 2022 USFL didn’t cater to the tired eyes of retired guys, but rather the demographic who likes their games with a truly modern touch. With its inaugural campaign in the books – capped off by a fantastic championship clash in a mostly packed Tom Benson Hall of Fame Stadium in Canton – the FOX-owned USFL showed there’s a place for spring pro football. And with plenty of close and exciting games augmented by everything from drones to helmet cams to post-play interviews, it gave fans a solid product. It was a success story during a time of year when football has failed and often failed spectacularly.

That said, I didn’t care for the hub format – even if it was in my hometown – and seeing games not involving the Birmingham Stallions played in front of just a handful of fans made for bad optics.

I wish the league had done some sort of local promotion along the lines of, “Hey, we know the Stallions are your favorite team, but who is your second favorite?” Have team reps and mascots from the other seven USFL clubs give away pennants and T-shirts, and that might’ve made a big impression on a little kid.

Dave the Wave could’ve quite possibly convinced a youngster (and his ticket-buying elders) to cheer for the New Orleans Breakers when Birmingham wasn’t playing at Protective Stadium or Legion Field.

Better yet, if you’re going to attach a city/region name to a team, let it play its home games in that city/region. I mean, the Philadelphia Stars never got closer than 900 miles to their “home” during the regular season.

But the idea was to keep costs down, and the circuit did that with its bubble. Job One was to figure out a way to be viable during its maiden voyage in order to keep sailing, and that mission was accomplished. According to an article in the Sports Business Journal, the USFL will expand from two to four hubs in 2023 (including Birmingham), which is better that this year’s format and shows forward progress. And considering the best business practice is to stay in business, it’s hard to argue with their approach.

Yet that circuit is as much a TV series as it is a sports league. The third version of the XFL, on the other hand, is apparently just as concerned about its in-house appeal. All you have to do is take a look at its 2023 teams.

In selecting the eight clubs for its latest reboot, it’s fairly obvious sites were chosen because they have a history of putting butts in the seats. Here’s per game attendance figures from the cities’ last spring football stints: Arlington/Dallas (17,163, XFL 2.0), DC (16,179, XFL 2.0), Houston (18,230, XFL 2.0), Las Vegas (22,618, original XFL), Orlando (19,648, Alliance of American Football), Seattle (25,616, XFL 2.0), San Antonio (27,721, Alliance of American Football) and St. Louis (28,541, XFL 2.0).

It’s Texas-heavy and has no presence in the top four Designated Market Areas (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia), and that seems risky. But people with far more money than me put the league together and they didn’t ask for my opinion, so I’m not going to worry about it.

I do find the league’s hybrid hub model interesting; the eight teams are kept together in one city (Arlington) for practice and on-site support, but will then travel to “home” locales for games.

Regardless, beer snakes should be magnificent when the XFL takes the field the weekend following Super Bowl LVII.

With its season starting in February and Disney (i.e., ABC and ESPN) handling TV coverage, it’ll get a head start on the USFL in 2023 since the FOX league once again plans to start up in April. Will folks in couch potato land who don’t have a team in either league be burned out by the time the XFL season is done, or get excited for season two of the USFL? We shall see.

And don’t forget the dark horse entry among spring leagues, Major League Football. Training camp is underway (a jamboree-style scrimmage was held on Sunday) and its inaugural mini-season is scheduled to start on August 9 with the championship game set for September 6. Despite the late summer/fall slate, the plan is to become a full-fledged spring league by 2023. And you can even invest in the league; details are available on its website.

This year all games (except for one) will be played on Tuesdays, with the idea to make it the only tackle football game available to watch on that day of the week.

This format is not unprecedented in alt-football history; the 1974 World Football League played most of its games on Wednesday nights with the TV game of the week staged on Thursdays. I’m looking forward to learning more about how Major League Football plans to conduct its business following next month’s soft launch.

So, if you happen to be one of those year-round football fanatics as I once was, I’m thrilled that you’ll (theoretically) never go wanting again. The XFL will lead into the USFL and MLFB, which will lead into the CFL, which will lead into the NFL, and then the cycle of professional football starts anew.

And who knows? Perhaps all these options will spark a rebirth in my desire to again make “offseason” pro football priority viewing. Until then, well, please tell me more about those labor pains …

The WFL in Canada

The Canadian Football League brought its brand of the gridiron game to the United States for a regular season contest in 1958. But did you know that 16 years later the World Football League returned the favor?

Yet just as Americans were cool to the historic Hamilton-Ottawa clash in Philadelphia, Canadians in London, Ontario, didn’t have much interest in what the WFL had to offer, either.

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

The September 2, 1974, contest between the Detroit Wheels and Portland Storm was hardly a memorable one, especially considering it featured two struggling franchises playing in a struggling first-year league. But it is notable in that it was moved from Rynearson Stadium in Ypsilanti, Michigan, to J.W. Wilson Stadium in London on less than a week’s notice – and gave the upstart circuit its only international appearance.

WFL historians will note that Toronto was granted an inaugural franchise (the Toronto Northmen), but faced so much pushback from both the CFL and the Canadian government that team owner John Bassett opted to move the club to Memphis.

With the Toronto team out, the 12-team WFL consisted entirely of U.S.-based franchises (although The Hawaiians, based in Honolulu, did provide the circuit with an exotic locale).

However, there was still a desire to plant a seed north of the American border.

“The league is anxious to play there for two reasons,” Tim Grandi, executive assistant to WFL commissioner Gary Davidson, told the Detroit Free Press. “We want to establish the precedent of having played in Canada since their Parliament never passed the legislation that would’ve banned American football leagues. And we want the people in that area to see what the World Football League is all about.”

The Wheels (0-8) played 35 miles away from Detroit in Eastern Michigan University’s 22,000-seat stadium, and drew just over 12,000 fans per game. They were already on their last legs in the Motor City, having been denied the chance to play at Tiger Stadium since the NFL Lions had exclusive football rights there. There was a strong rumor ahead of the game that the team was headed to Charlotte in a relocation move, so at this point it probably didn’t matter where the game took place.

“We approved Charlotte as a location for a World Football League team a couple of weeks ago,” Grandi said. “It is an acceptable location for us, but we have not approved the transfer of any team, anywhere. And there is no transfer setup at this time.

“Everyone knows the problems of the Detroit team, but they are still attempting to keep the team there and that is the way the situation stands now.”

A potential move wasn’t the reason for the venue change, though. Detroit and London might be separated by only 120 miles, but it was actually a Portland official who requested the game be played in Canada.

Bob Harris, a London businessman who was a major stockholder with the Storm, wanted to show off the league in his hometown. He had planned to put a CFL team in London for the 1974 season but couldn’t come up with the $2 million price tag. So, landing a WFL franchise in Ontario might be the next best thing, and a 2 p.m. game on Labor Day would be a chance to test the waters.

“We have a 180-acre site off Highway 401 where we hope to build a stadium one day,” Harris told the Associated Press.

Unfortunately for Harris – and anyone else who thought the WFL might find a home in Canada – there was little interest in the game.

Whether two winless teams and a sinking league were to blame no one knows, but only 5,101 tickets were sold (most for the equivalent of $2.50 in American money) and many news accounts suggest less than 3,000 fans were in the stands.

For the record, Portland won, 18-7. The Storm improved to 1-7-1 with their first victory and went on to finish the campaign 7-12-1.

The Wheels, on the other hand, didn’t move to Charlotte and didn’t finish the season at all.

They played one more game in Ypsilanti on September 6 and picked up their only victory on September 11 against the Florida Blazers in Orlando. Detroit contested its final four games on the road and folded following a week 14 loss to Shreveport. (Charlotte did get a team via relocation, but it was the New York Stars).

The 1974 WFL was buried in debt, and a reboot in 1975 only made it 12 weeks until the league went out of business.

In the end, the league that wanted to represent the world left American soil only once, playing a largely meaningless game in a small stadium in Ontario. Still, a few thousand Canadians got to see football history – even though it’s history that most fans have long since forgotten.

CFL in America, circa 1958

One of my biggest fanboy moments came on July 15, 1995, when I got to see the Birmingham Barracudas take on the Hamilton Tiger-Cats in a Week Three contest at Legion Field. It was a bit surreal … not only was I watching my longtime favorite Canadian Football League team play in America – in person – they were playing a new CFL franchise located in my hometown.

Of course, Hamilton had been crossing the border to play regular season games since 1993 as part of the “CFL in America” experiment. But 37 years earlier, the Ti-Cats made American football history by playing another Canadian team on U.S. soil in a regular season matchup. That was a first for the newly minted CFL.

Scott Adamson writes stuff. Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

On September 14, 1958, Hamilton and the Ottawa Rough Riders met at Philadelphia’s Municipal Stadium in a Big Four (East Division) clash. It was the fifth game of the season for both clubs and was something of a test drive for the league in the United States. Canadian football teams had played several exhibitions in front of American audiences, but this showdown had real stakes.

Hamilton, which agreed to move the game from Ivor Wynne Stadium, was coached by former Philadelphia Eagles boss Jim Trimble and featured four former Eagles: Skippy Giancanelli, Ralph Goldston, Bob Kelley and Hubert Bobo. The hope was a bit of “home cooking” might result in a record crowd. The stadium seated 102,000, and with the start of the NFL season still two weeks away, organizer Bud Dudley expected 40,000 fans to show up for the gridiron novelty.

“We hope to draw in a crowd that will break the Canadian record of 39,000 odd,” Dudley told the Canadian Press.

He added that advance ticket sales were already in the 20,000 range and with prices set at $10, $5 and $3, 17,000 patrons were enough for the event to break even.

Proceeds from the game would benefit both the children’s hospital and rehabilitation center in Philly, and it would come on what had been declared “Canadian-American Day” by the city’s mayor, Richardson Dilworth.

Leading up to the contest a few local papers took the time to give fans a quick tutorial on the Canadian game, emphasizing the extra player per side, three downs to make a first down, and longer, wider playing field (although the configuration of Municipal Stadium meant the field could be only 100 yards long instead of the 110-yard length used in the CFL).

So, was the game a success?

From a strictly football standpoint it certainly was for the Tiger-Cats, who won, 24-18, and improved to 5-0 on the year.

But the large crowd didn’t materialize, with only 15,110 showing up and 3,000 of them coming down from Canada.

The Canadian Press asked a few American sports writers for their take on the game and the reviews they gave were hardly raving.

“If you’ll forgive me, I’d agitate for four downs on your game,” Jack Walsh of the Washington Post said.

“There is more ball control and, consequently, more sustained scoring drives in the American variety of the game,” added Philadelphia Bulletin writer John Fraser.

And Bulletin sports editor Ed Pollock opined, “As the game progresses, it becomes apparent that the Canadian attack is handicapped by limited number of downs, thus there are fewer drives of good length.”

The American fans who showed up were likely put off by the 31 punts in the contest, and if they weren’t familiar with the rules (Hamilton scored four singles) they probably spent much of the afternoon scratching their heads.

Whether that meeting was the reason or not, the CFL never attempted an all-Canadian regular season game in the United States again.

The next time the CFL did play a game in the Lower 48 that counted in the standings came on July 17, 1993, when the Sacramento Gold Miners hosted the Calgary Stampeders.

Football history is interesting, ain’t it?