What if the NFL had a ‘traditional’ developmental league?

Players who suited up for the San Antonio Commanders and Arizona Hotshots, seen here during an Alliance of American Football game in Tempe, Arizona, were hoping to use the league as a springboard to get back into the NFL. (Photo by Jennifer Stewart/AAF/Getty Images)

The original version of this column appeared in September, 2018. Since the Alliance of American Football ceased operations earlier this week, I decided to tweak, update and repost it.

Goodbye, Alliance of American Football – I really liked you, but only had eight weeks to get to know you.

Scott Adamson writes about alternative pro football leagues because it makes him happy, Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

Hello, XFL – not the old, stinky XFL from 2001, but the (supposedly) better version set for a February 2020 launch.

Like the AAF, it’ll feature players hoping to work their way back to the National Football League.

The Alliance was angling to become an “official” developmental league for the NFL, and I’m guessing the XFL might have similar plans at some point.

But …

While you can claim any minor league is a de facto farm system for the NFL, a traditional one has never truly existed.

College football fills the void relatively well, especially now that so many more elite players are physically and mentally ready to make a quick transition to the pro ranks.

Still, it’s not like the Carolina Panthers can call up a lineman from the Clemson Tigers during the season.

That’s why I’m a little surprised that the NFL doesn’t have a legitimate minor league system.

As close as it came was the World League of American Football, which morphed into NFL Europe and finally NFL Europa.

Again, though, it was played in the spring, so it didn’t follow the model of, say, Major League Baseball affiliates.

If I was tasked with putting together an NFL developmental league, all 32 franchises would have a “B Team” that would also incorporate the scout teams.

These squads would not only be a good proving ground for rookies, but give playing time to backups and paying jobs to a lot of guys who otherwise would be out of football work after training camp. I’d think it would be relatively easy to put together a 40-man per club developmental league roster.

Every year there are roughly 3,000 draft-eligible players from the college ranks, and NFL teams each have 90 players when training camp starts. There are currently five pro indoor leagues and myriad semi-pro circuits, so there would be no shortage of men wanting another – and better – opportunity.*

*I deliberately left out the Canadian Football League because I love the CFL and don’t want it screwed with. But, obviously, an NFL developmental league would raid it for players.

In order to control expenses, my NFLDL would be divided into four, eight-team quadrants (North, South, East and West) that played regional slates.

For example, the South Quadrant might feature franchises in Birmingham, Charleston, Jackson (Miss.), Louisville, Memphis, Orlando, Raleigh and Shreveport. Teams would play each other twice over the course of a 14-game regular season, and then the four quadrant champions could meet in a four-team playoff.

And to be a real, working farm system, the season would need to run (mostly) concurrent with the NFL schedule, not in the spring or summer. It could start maybe two weeks after the NFL season begins.

If games were played on Tuesday or Wednesday nights, any given player would be ready to compete on any given Sunday after getting a “call-up.”

On the other hand, if a skill player is trying to work his way back from an injury (or a rookie QB needs some real game reps), the NFLDL would be the place to get them.

The farm system would also be a laboratory for rule changes and innovations.

Each year the NFL competition committee considers several tweaks, but only a handful make it to the field.

Why not give them a test drive in the NFLDL?

I think such a league would certainly be a benefit to the NFL in terms of player development. A key question, though, is how to fund it and how to get the NFL Players Association to agree to it.

Would the farm teams be owned by the same person or groups who own the parent clubs?

Would the NFL teams pay the salaries of all of the NFLDL players, or just the ones on loan?

Would fans even support what amounts to a Triple A football league when they’re already being overloaded with NFL and college games?

There’s a good chance we’ll never know.

Still, it’s something to think about – even if I’m just thinking out loud.

Manziel is gone, but the CFL has plenty of good QBs

For someone who lives roughly 1,000 miles from the nearest Canadian border crossing, I’m a little protective of the country.

Scott Adamson writes about alternative pro football leagues because it makes him happy, Follow him on Twitter @adamsonsl

Well, that’s not entirely true – I’m a little protective when it comes to the country’s professional football league. (I’ll trust the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to handle the other stuff).

Anyway, when the Montreal Alouettes announced on Wednesday that Johnny Manziel was off the team and out of the Canadian Football League – permanently – I didn’t bat an eye.

I was even a bit relieved.

While you can argue that Manziel might’ve created more interest in the CFL from fans based in the United States, I never thought his presence was required to make the league better. As far as I’m concerned, the league was already just fine in the QB department, thanks.

Manziel was originally the gridiron property of the Hamilton Tiger-Cats, which set off alarm bells for me. I’m a Ti-Cats fan, and I liked Jeremiah Masoli as the presumptive starting quarterback before the 2018 season. I feared “Johnny Football” would be allowed to step in and take over for no other reason than he once won a Heisman Trophy.

At best, he’d be a distraction.

“We’re excited to add Johnny Manziel to our roster, particularly getting it done now so that Johnny can join his new teammates and the coaching staff for a full training camp,” then-Ti-Cats coach June Jones said at the time. “We feel like we’ve got an excellent group of quarterbacks, and the addition of Johnny only improves our football team in our pursuit of the ultimate goal, which is to win a Grey Cup Championship.”

That was coach-talk, of course, but it didn’t stop me from worrying that Jones would move Manziel to the head of the class – especially after he said he thought Manziel could be one of the best QBs to ever play in the CFL.

Fortunately, it didn’t happen.

Manziel never took a regular season snap for the Tim Hortons Field tenants and was traded to Montreal in July.

Johnny Manziel’s time in the CFL is up. (Dominick Gravel / Alouettes de Montreal photo)

He did get plenty of playing time for the Alouettes – completing 106 of 165 passes for 1,290 yards, five TDs and seven interceptions – but now he’s gone because he, and I’m quoting from the CFL press release here, “… contravened the agreement which made him eligible to play in the league.”

I don’t know what he did and, really, couldn’t care less.

What I do know is the CFL has plenty of quarterbacks who I enjoy watching.

Masoli is my guy because he plays for my team, but it’s not blind loyalty. The dude threw for 5,209 yards and 28 touchdowns last year, and tied a league record for most consecutive 300-plus yardage games with 10.

Like Manziel, he’s dealt with off-the-field issues (second-degree burglary while in college at Oregon and misdemeanor drug and traffic offenses before landing at Ole Miss).

Unlike Manziel, though, he has apparently learned to stay out of trouble and now makes headlines only for what he does on the field.

Mike Reilly is also a boss; he threw for 5,562 yards and 30 touchdowns last year with the Edmonton Eskimos – his second consecutive 30 TD season. This year he’ll be behind center at British Columbia, giving the Lions a turbo boost during his second stint with the franchise.

Calgary’s Bo Levi Mitchell is creeping up on legend status as he engineers the Stampeders’ offense.

In seven seasons with the Horsemen he has thrown for 24,473 yards and 150 touchdowns; last year he accounted for 35 major aerial scores.

Edmonton’s Trevor Harris, Winnipeg’s Matt Nichols, Saskatchewan’s Zach Collaros – the CFL is full of talented and capable signal callers, which is kinda important when you only have three downs to make 10 yards.

And I guess ultimately I like the fact that most of these quarterbacks – even though they harbor NFL dreams – come to Canada and grow as CFL players instead of looking for the nearest exit.

I never got the impression Manziel was fully committed to the league, and that’s why I never caught “Johnny Football Fever.”

Look, I’ve got nothing personal against Manziel. Whatever problems he has I hope he can learn not to “contravene” again. If he gets a chance in the Alliance of American Football this year or the XFL in 2020, I wish him the best.

But when it comes to the Canadian Football League, I don’t need a “big name” to have big fun.

Just show me a field 110 yards long and 65 yards wide, and I’ll trust the players on the field to make it worth my while.

Especially the quarterbacks.

 

Second season of Major League Rugby off to a great start

Many years ago, ABC’s “Wide World of Sports” was the one television program that provided American viewers the chance to sneak a peek at athletic competition not readily available to them.

Scott Adamson’s sports column appears pretty much whenever he feels like writing it.

It’s where I saw my first World Cup soccer match, which led to an obsession with “The Beautiful Game” that has lasted for almost half a century.

And I think it’s also where I was introduced to rugby, which has recently shot way up the charts in terms of my interest.

I have a vague memory of being a kid and watching a bunch of guys play “football without pads,” and a little research shows that “Wide World of Sports” featured the English Rugby League Cup Final on May 27, 1967.

I would’ve been only 6 at the time, and a one-off rugby match is kind of a random thing to remember.

Yet, I’m going to give it credit for planting a seed that sprouted in a major way last weekend when I watched four Major League Rugby matches. And I hope to watch many, many more in the years to come.

Saturday featured three terrific games. The club I’ve chosen to cheer for, Rugby United New York, edged San Diego, 25-23; NOLA (New Orleans) held off Toronto, 36-31; and Houston nipped Austin, 21-20.

Opening week action ended on Sunday with Seattle besting Glendale (greater Denver), 20-18. (Utah, the ninth team in the league, had a bye week).

If the founders of MLR were hoping to woo casual fans, their teams couldn’t have done a better job of showing off the product. The largest margin of victory was five points, so every contest was in doubt until the end.

I’m already plotting my viewing strategy for this week, which features one game on Friday and two on Saturday.

In years past, my sportsball weekends in February were dominated by soccer, hockey and basketball. Now rugby has been added to the rotation, and I’m pretty sure it’s going to stay there until the season wraps up in June.

So why the sudden surge of interest?

Well, because it’s really interesting.

Last season was the first for MLR and I considered myself a fan (for what it’s worth, I rooted for the NOLA Gold). I enjoyed what I saw – especially early in the season – but ultimately I saw less and less in the spring because I often found myself distracted by other sports.

Over the summer, though, I started closely following Premiership Rugby – the top league in England – and that helped me ease into learning the nuances of the game and the flow of rugby union competition.

Plus, I had already signed up for MLR email alerts, so I was getting info on America’s domestic league on a regular basis.

As the season drew closer the more interested in it I became, and I decided New York would be my new favorite team going forward. (Even though I don’t live there I’ve always loved visiting NYC, and have an affinity for New York-based pro teams).

So while United was the main attraction, I invested a decent chunk of my weekend in Major League Rugby.

It was a sound investment.

And really, it makes perfect sense that I’d become a fan.

I’m passionate about association football and tackle football, and rugby is a logical bridge between the two.

I enjoy the combination of physical strength and agility, and the speed and motion keep me entertained from start to finish. Plus, the rules are relatively simple – and simple to learn from a fan’s perspective.

Next year the circuit will grow by a fourth, with the New England Free Jacks and teams in Atlanta and Washington boosting the size of MLR to 12 teams.

And since the game has become my new “it” sport, I hope its professional version takes hold and finds a solid niche in North America.

Obviously, I have no way of knowing if Major League Rugby is here to stay.

What I do know, however, is that I plan to stay with it for as long as it lasts.